Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Chirp, chirp

5.5 hours researching/reading, 0.5 hours administrivia

Greetings from Bryant Park, right next to the NY Public Library. There's free WiFi here, so I'm blogging outdoors on a lovely summer afternoon. There's a little sparrow behind me chirping his heart out. Guess it must be mating season. It's rare that you can see an individual bird moving its beak to chirp, as opposed to hearing birds chirping ambiently.

Birds are on my mind, as the Spanish equivalent "pajaros" is one of the many nicknames given to irregular armed forces during La Violencia in Colombia. I was at the NYPL this afternoon looking into regional studies of La Violencia. This morning, in preparation, I started putting together a database of information about the different states of Colombia, to help me decide whether comparing two states makes sense for my dissertation.

The bottom line from today is that the regions of Tolima and Antioquia each have one very strong regional study that draws upon significant primary evidence available through the state government or local universities. Whether those two make sense for a comparison is another question, but it's good to have that base to work with.

One of the studies I reviewed had one of the strangest and most disturbing sets of images I've ever seen. One of the hard things about studying La Violencia is the extreme forms that violence took in the countryside. This book, a study of the violence in the state of Tolima (not the primary one for that region, but still useful), featured a series of illustrations based on interviews with peasants who lived through the period. They illustrate the forms of murder that took place. The illustrations themselves are little more than silhouettes of a generic human form, like the outline of a crash-test dummy. But on successive pages, that innocent, clinical silhouette went through the most outlandish tortures, one at a time, demonstrating what interviewees recalled having seen happened. (Exhibit A, Exhibit B, etc.) These are schematic drawings, and no blood is shown, but the schematic little body parts are simply...elsewhere. The ratio of horror of content to blandness of presentation was astronomical, and quite unsettling, to say the least.

Anyway, kind of a downer note to end on, but it was a productive day overall. Tomorrow I'll be back to continue looking at regional studies, and I'm hoping by the end of the week to be able to make a decision about the regional comparison piece.

In the meantime, I'll try to take some time to write tomorrow to balance out the research.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

OK, thanks for the strand clarification, I think I've got it. More parallel strands for now, to be woven eventualmente de alguna forma. Roger that.

So, not sure if I'm supposed to berate you for not having written anything again today, so I won't, and am heartened by the promise of tomorrow. Nonetheless, I'll put in another plug for writing a little bit every day. Doing a little bit every day now is going to be easier than writing for 5-6 hours straight every day in October, porque that's vitualmente imposible.

Bravo on the continued thoughts on sub-national comparison. I think it sounds potentially very cool. Do the "regions" that you mention you might compare remain intact through the time period of study? Are they still the same today? Are you thinking about the stability of governance (i.e. your DV) at the national or regional or state or what level?

Oh -- I had a thought about another institutional type variable: there's an article in the newest LARR by Jeremy Adelman called "Between Order and Liberty." It examines the "intellectual foundings of Arg constitutionalism from the 1830s to the 1850s... and argues that Arg constitutionalism had liberal roots but invoked arguments that could neither bring unity to the state-building coalition nor resolve some basic tensions within the framework of national sovereignty." I know you've mentioned the importance of the electoral rules enshrined in the const., but constitutions obv outline not only how power is to be accessed, but how it is to be exercised (thanks, Sebas!). Are there other constitutional elements that might be important for you? I think you mentioned the idea of constitutions being some kind of bargain, which I think is about the coolest idea ever.

Good going, amigo! See you tomorrow!